Back to Legal Industry News

Appeal hearing rules legal adviser was not subject to age discrimination

Appeal hearing rules legal adviser was not subject to age discrimination

An appeal hearing has ruled that a man who previously successfully argued he was the victim of age discrimination was in fact not.

A man referred to as Mr Homer was denied an application for a pay rise by his employers the Police National Legal Database in his role as a legal adviser.

This was because a new system put in place by the organisation required candidates to have a law degree, which he did not.

The worker claimed age discrimination, saying that he had been disadvantaged because he would not be able to complete a law degree before he retired.

However, a recent appeal found that the financial consequence that resulted from being unable to complete a degree before retirement was an inevitable result of age and not one of age discrimination.

Responding to the verdict, Arpita Dutt, employment solicitor at Russell Jones & Walker, commented: "This case is the first time the Court of Appeal has explored in detail the indirect age discrimination provisions which were alleged to have prevented Mr Homer from being re-graded prior to retirement.

"It refers to the present retirement age of 65 as a 'disguised barrier'. Unfortunately, in this case Mr Homer did not establish that he belonged to an age group which had been put at a particular disadvantage compared to persons in other age groups by having insufficient time before retirement at 65 to complete the part-time law digress course and so achieve re-grading.

"The case may be the subject of a further appeal to the Supreme Court."