Car exhaust and fumes

Collective actions

Court of Appeal ruling on Johnson v. Firstrand Bank looks to pay out billions for motor finance customers

In a victory for consumer rights, the Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of the claimant in the Johnson v. Firstrand Bank case, setting a historic precedent in the motor finance sector.


30 October 2024

In a groundbreaking moment for consumer rights, the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Johnson v. Firstrand Bank has set a new precedent in the UK motor finance industry. The decision, secured with the backing of Sentinel Legal and HD Law, holds lenders responsible for mis-selling practices in Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) agreements, a move that could see banks return over £21 billion to consumers.

The Johnson case exposed unethical mis-selling practices in the motor finance sector, where consumers signed PCP agreements with undisclosed fees and inflated interest rates. Many customers entered these agreements under the impression they were receiving fair terms, only to be paying high interest rates. The Court of Appeal’s decision mandates transparency, requiring lenders to prioritise clear terms and consumer rights in their finance agreements.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has noted the implications of this ruling and is expected to respond by tightening regulatory measures.

Sentinel Legal Director Sam Ward described the decision as a ‘major win for consumer justice,’ explaining, “The finance industry has, for too long, benefited from the murky nature of PCP agreements. This ruling empowers consumers and holds banks accountable for unfair practices.”

Kevin Durkin, Director at HD Law emphasised the role of the courts in exposing these hidden commission structures that have historically enriched lenders and dealerships at the expense of consumers. “For years, commissions were buried in fine print,” Durkin noted. “This ruling emphasises the need for transparency and sets a new industry standard.”

This ruling compels the motor finance sector to confront the financial implications of mis-selling PCP agreements, with lenders now likely to face substantial claims for redress.

The ramifications of the Court of Appeal’s ruling are expected to impact across the motor finance industry, particularly affecting lenders who have relied heavily on commission-based agreements and high-interest PCP deals. The FCA, already engaged in monitoring the motor industry with the recent judicial review involving Barclays, is poised to step up its regulatory oversight. This increased scrutiny could prompt further industry-wide changes, with more banks and finance providers reassessing their practices to meet new transparency standards.

With further cases likely, this ruling not only brings immediate financial relief to many but also signals a step towards greater accountability within the finance sector.

How can Slater and Gordon help?

If you took out a financial agreement before 28 January 2021, you could be one of the thousands in the UK to be owed mis-sold finance compensation. When customers take out motor finance contracts, it is essential they are given the information they need to determine whether the contract they are entering into works for them and is financially valid.

If you have taken out a PCP or HP contract where information has been withheld, or purposefully confused or hidden, you may have been mis-sold and are therefore entitled to make a claim. To find out if you are entitled, visit here

Find out more on mis-sold car finance claims
Man in Mercedes car about to start the engine.
Collective Actions
How you can find your previous car registrations
If you bought a car on finance, you could be eligible for a claim but to register, you will need your car registration and there are a few simple ways to find it.
Woman car drive driving
Collective actions
How do you find the details of previous car finance contracts
As the FCA’s investigation into hidden commission in car finance continues, car owners are hunting down their old financial agreements to uncover whether they’ve been mis-sold. Yet locating the details can be difficult years after the event. Here, we look at how you can find the details you need to make a claim.
Newsroom - traffic cars vehicles
Collective action
Myth-busting: What you need to know about mis-sold car finance
Mis-sold car finance has been all over the news recently and with a lot of technical jargon being used and many people spreading misinformation, it is completely understandable to be unsure on what and what is not true. So, we are going to bust some of the myths surrounding claiming back on your mis sold car finance.
Hands on the wheel of a car driving along the motorway
Collective actions
What is the difference between PCP, Hire Purchase and Personal Contract Hire?
If you are one of the many who are unsure on whether you are eligible to make a mis-sold car finance claim, it’s important to determine what type of finance agreement you had. Below, we break down the differences between PCP, Hire Purchase and Leasing.
Search our website
Filter
Filter:
Sorry, we have no results to show
Please try a different search term.
Oops, something went wrong
Please try typing in your search again.
Back to top