Home >
Medical negligence >
Families seeking answers about lung disease care at Epsom & St Helier Hospitals
Medical negligence claims
Families seeking answers about lung disease care at Epsom & St Helier Hospitals
Serious concerns about Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) care at Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust were first raised years ago, yet many families affected by these issues have never been contacted. Slater and Gordon is supporting individuals affected by the failings at the Trust.
Serious concerns about Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) care at Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust were first raised years ago, yet many families affected by these issues have never been contacted or given clear explanations about what happened. Initial concerns were raised as far back as 2019 but were not acted on at the time. The Trust has since acknowledged that disruption during the COVID‑19 pandemic contributed to these early warnings being missed. It was only when further reports were made in 2023 that the issues were fully scrutinised.
A subsequent Trust investigation confirmed that 216 ILD patients received inadequate or incorrect care, including failures in diagnosis, treatment, and referral. Although the investigation began in 2023, the consequences are still being felt today.
Slater and Gordon is supporting individuals who are now beginning to understand the extent to which their care may align with the failings confirmed by the Trust, including Laura, whose husband Daniel died in 2024 after receiving ILD treatment at Epsom and St Helier. Historically, the Trust has shared little information with affected families and many have been kept in the dark, therefore we believe there may be others who were similarly impacted but have never been given the opportunity to come forward.
Laura and Daniel’s Story
“Without answers, I can’t move forward.”
Daniel, 48, lived with Interstitial Lung Disease and had been receiving treatment at Epsom and St Helier for several years. In late 2023, his condition deteriorated rapidly. While he was still alive, the Trust contacted him to raise concerns about the care he had received, something Laura describes as a “double trauma”, arriving at the same time she was preparing to lose him.
Daniel had been prescribed Roflumilast, a medication not licensed to treat ILD in the UK, for five years without the regular review expected for such a progressive condition. Only after Laura made a formal complaint did she begin to learn that Daniel’s experience reflected a wider pattern of treatment failures identified by the Trust.
Even today, she feels she has been left “in a silo”, without clarity on where Daniel’s case sits in the broader picture.
“Daniel’s death was avoidable and premature, and Laura understandably has so many questions around what happened and why. The fact there are so many other ILD cases also being investigated by this Trust gives cause for great concern,” says senior associate Nadia Saber.
“Knowing that, had Daniel received better care, they could have enjoyed so many more years together will haunt Laura forever. We will support Laura in every way possible to find the answers and accountability she needs and deserves.”
What the Trust’s investigation found
A review by the Trust identified major, systemic failings across 216 ILD patient cases, including:
Failure to Investigate: 20% receiving insufficient diagnostic investigation
Missed Referrals: 42% not referred to the specialist ILD multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Lack of Treatment: 30% receiving no treatment despite progressive illness
Inappropriate Treatment: 9% receiving inappropriate or unsuitable treatment
The investigation centred on care delivered by Veronica Varney, a respiratory consultant at St Helier Hospital. She was referred to the General Medical Council (GMC) in October 2023 and left the Trust in the same year.
Why concerns went unaddressed for years
Warnings about ILD care were first raised in 2019, but the Trust has since acknowledged that these concerns were not acted on, in part because of operational pressures and disruption during the COVID‑19 pandemic. It wasn’t until 2023, when further complaints and alerts were raised, that a full review began.
This delay meant that many patients continued to receive unsafe or inadequate care for years before the true scale of the issue became clear.
Why this matters now
Although the Trust’s investigation is historic, its effects continue to impact families today. Many people:
Were never given the full information at the time
Are only now becoming aware of how extensive the failings were
Are seeing echoes of their own experiences in the Trust’s findings
Lost loved ones without the clarity or accountability they deserve
Still have no understanding of what, if anything, the GMC investigation concluded
Laura’s experience shows that these concerns have not disappeared and that there may be people who still need answers but have never been given the opportunity to seek them.
These issues deserve to be fully understood, acknowledged, and addressed. Slater and Gordon is committed to helping anyone who believes they may have been affected.
Kept informed regularly as to how my claim was going, prompt replies to any questions I had, excellent customer service at all times. Excellent service from all staff that have been involved in my claim.
Ms S (medical negligence client)
I just wanted to say thank you so much for everything Slater and Gordon have done to fight this case for us. I appreciate it has involved a lot of people. Please can you also thank the expert witnesses who have provided their expertise and help.
Mr and Mrs H (medical negligence client)
I cannot recommend Slater and Gordon enough, throughout the entire period of the case, all the staff have been both very professional, and supportive.
Mr Q (medical negligence client)